Tuesday 2 December 2014

Labour politicians in Northumberland have expressed outrage as it emerged that the former Liberal Democrat administration which was supported by Northumberland’s Conservatives planned to join up with then Conservative led North Tyneside Council to ‘flog public services North of the Tyne’


Labour reveal true cost of ConDem £4billion privatisation plans for the ‘North of Tyne’ public services

‘Time for Northumberland Liberals and Conservatives to admit they were wrong over ‘Impower Report’ and to apologise to the thousands of council employees who lost their jobs under ConDems’.

Labour politicians in Northumberland have expressed outrage as it emerged that the former Liberal Democrat administration which was supported by Northumberland’s Conservatives planned to join up with then Conservative led North Tyneside Council to ‘flog public services North of the Tyne’. They’re pointing to misleading claims made at the time by the member who was in charge of piloting the programme through the council as evidence of an ‘orchestrated attempt to mislead the public and employees’. Councillor Andrew Tebbutt who has been described as the ‘portfolio holder for privatisation’ issued a series of briefings based on the council funded ‘Impower report’. The briefings have been described as ‘misleading’ and ‘partial’.

It has now emerged that Northumberland and North Tyneside Council’s wanted to include Northumbria Healthcare Trust in the mass privatisation which would have been worth over £4billion and would have resulted in job losses between 1850 and 3500 council employees in Northumberland alone.

Northumberland Liberal Democrats identified 35 services which would have formed the first part of the huge mass privatisation and would have been completed in Dec 2013 if Labour had not formed an administration in May 2013.

Labour are pointing out that one of its most successful policies since that election in 2013 would not have possible under the ConDem privatisation plans as car parking would have been privatised and free parking would have been impossible to deliver. They believe that Conservative politicians should explain why they were promising free parking while seemingly supporting the privatisation of parking behind the scenes.

Labour have tabled a motion to Full Council on 3 Dec 2014 setting out the case for public services which are properly accountable to the people who use them and are not run for a private profit and are challenging Lib Dems and Conservatives in advance of the meeting to rule out any future plans to privatise services in the county.

Councillor Laura Pidcock who tabled the motion said

“North of the Tyne public services were being fattened up for privatisation under the previous ConDem coalition in County Hall. This £4billion plus contract would have given the private sector companies involved a yearly profit of over £40m with thousands of council jobs lost. The Lib Dems own figures said that the county’s private sector would lose 34 jobs for every 100 public sector jobs lost so this would have been a truly tragic double whammy for hundreds of Northumberland families. The Liberals and Conservatives have a chance to back our motion which would commit future council’s to halt any planned privatisation unless they made a detailed case to the county’s residents first. They have to show they’ve learned from their mistakes.”

NOTES FOR EDITORS

·         The suggested duration of the ‘partnership’ with the private sector was 10 years – therefore the total estimated value of the ‘contract’ to be tendered in March 2013 was (total x 10)

·         Total estimated 3rd Party spend which was also due to be included in contract as evidenced in ‘Impower report’ was £295m per year

Service
Employees[1]
Gross 12/13 expenditure
Total income
ICT Services
97.00
£5,723,660
£545,750
Financial Services
165.23
£5,477,600
£415,080
HR & Employee Services
40.63
£1,041,240
£79,250
Front Office
199.24
£7,509,250
£1,599,300
Procurement
17.40
£654,580
£325,770
Property Services & FM
506.44
£13,897,740
£7,977,530
Transport
87.16
£8,889,240
£27,500
Highways & Engineering
267.00
£16,472,300
£330,800
Neighbourhood Services
263.52
£10,147,280
£1,409,330
Sub-total
1643.64
£69,812,890
£12,710,310
3rd party “addressable” spend[2]
0
£295,000,000
£0
Total
1643.64
£364,812,890
£12,710,310

 

 

First wave of privatisation under Lib Dems PG 9 - 93

ICT Services

1.         Information Service Group

2.         Information & Applications

3.         Infrastructure

Financial Services

4.         Head of Financial Services

5.         Transactions Management

6.         Accounts Payable

7.         Accounts Receivable

8.         Pensions Administration

9.         Council Tax and NNDR

10.       Benefits Service (excluding Fraud Investigations)

11.       Insurance Administration

12.       Cashiers

13.       Systems Administration (AP, AR, Employee Services)

14.       Revenues & Benefits Management

15.       Alnwick and Berwick databases

16.       Area Management

17.       Quality Assurance

18.       Business Systems

HR & Employee Services

19.       Employee Services (including Payroll)

Front Office Services

20.       Libraries

21.       Tourist Information Centres

22.       Customer Access Points

23.       Customer Services

Procurement

24.       Procurement Admin – Sourcing & Requisitioning

25.       Category management & Controllable 3rd Party Spend

Property Services & FM

26.       Property & Estates Services (excludes Land & Assets)

27.       Facilities Management

28.       Schools Crossing Patrols

Transport

29.       Fleet Management

30.       Parking

Highways & Engineering

31.       Highways Services

32.       Engineering Services

33.       Street Lighting

Neighbourhood Services

34.       Street Scene

             35.      Countryside

 

PUBLIC BODY
VALUE
TOTAL
Northumberland County Council represented by Lib Dems
£364,812,890 x 10 years
£3.65billion
North Tyneside Council represented by Conservatives
£26m x 10 years
£260million
Northumbria Healthcare Trust
£30m x 10 years
£300million
 
 
£4.21billion

 



[1] Associated with the functions currently deemed in-scope
[2] This equates to 69% of the Council’s total 3rd party expenditure

No comments:

Post a Comment